Skip to main content

Environmental exchanges in Earthster

How we name interactions of your model with the environment

Updated yesterday

Disclaimer: This document describes Earthster's list of environmental exchanges and logic thereof, used from November 9th 2025 onwards (last and most meaningful extension from FEDEFL). To read the report and log from before that date, see here.

At Earthster, we believe in global standards. As such, we did not create a new exchange list from scratch. Instead, we adopted the Federal LCA Commons Environmental Flow List (FEDEFL), developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

FEDEFL offers several key advantages:

  • Extremely comprehensive: Over 330,000 exchanges, compared to 94,000 in the widely used ILCD list and to 9,800 exchanges in ecoinvent. Provides more options for specifying context.

  • Minimal redundancy: Substances with the same meaning do not appear under different names, reducing confusion (often a problem in ILCD), since it has a consistent structure.

  • Open-source: Built on LCA research and designed for practical LCA applications by the community. Earthster has contributed updates and improvements to the list.

  • Highly interoperable: Mappings exist to other systems such as ecoinvent, openLCA, ILCD, and for implementing impact assessment methods, and several databases are natively available, including USLCI, CORRIM, and USEEIO.

Why extend FEDEFL

One of the benefits of FEDEFL (its consistency) comes at a cost: structural changes take longer to be implemented, since they require discussion with the LCA community and consensus.

Because of this, Earthster has developed as system to implement extensions quickly, and adjust when FEDEFL catches up to those extensions. Since Earthster is an active contributor, FEDEFL sometimes just incorporates those extensions. In other cases, FEDEFL may diverge from Earthster's path, in which case we backfill our data accordingly to stay in sync with the standard. This makes the Earthster extended FEDEFL a superset of FEDEFL, that is more compatible with other environmental exchange lists like ILCD or ecoinvent.

Earthster extensions to FEDEFL

Below can be found the extensions Earthster has introduced, with the date of introduction of those extensions. More recent extensions are shown on top.

Long-term flows

Introduced 2025-11-10

Some emissions occur only centuries to millennia after the original production process—for example, the release of heavy metals from landfills or construction rubble into water, which can harm freshwater ecosystems. Because of this extreme temporal lag, there is no scientific consensus on whether such long-term emissions should be included in life cycle impact assessment. The decision is therefore left to method and database developers.

The FEDEFL applies a conservative approach by treating long-term emissions as normal emissions. However, method and database providers often report those environmental exchanges independently. One notable case reporting those is Ecoinvent. Following FEDEFL strictly means much higher impacts than ecoinvent for the EF inorganic toxicity categories, and on average about a 5% higher impact for EF Particulate matter.

To align the impact results better with ILCD and ecoinvent, we therefore added two new long-term contexts: one for emission water (long-term) and another for emission/air (long-term). These are the equivalent long-term flows for EF and ecoinvent:

Table 4: Long-term contexts in earthster and their equivalent in ecoinvent and ILCD

Context name in Earthster

Context name in ecoinvent

Context name in ILCD

emission/air/long-term

low population density, long-term

Emissions to air, unspecified (long-term)

emission/water/long-term

ground-, long-term

Emissions to water, unspecified (long-term)

  • New exchanges were created for each exchange name belonging to the following classes: Group, Chemical, Geological, Water, Energy and Other.

  • These contexts only make sense for chemical substances and groups of chemical substances (~5.8k substances). Which means ~11.6k new flows.

  • Impact methods without long-term exchanges: For impact methods that do not specify the characterization factors for long-term exchanges (ReCiPe, CML, IPCC, TRACI), we used the values of closely-related contexts (emission/air/troposphere/rural for long-term emissions to air, and emission/water/subterranean for long-term emissions to water) for a given substance.

Land use and land transformation exchanges

Introduced 2024-11-28

In LCA literature, exchanges of the class “Land” are divided into three main types:

  • Land use exchanges, which represent the occupation of a given area over a certain period (measured in m²·year).

  • Land transformation exchanges, which represent the conversion of one land type into another (measured in ).

  • Volume occupied exchanges, which represent the permanent occupation of a given volume of land (measured in )

The FEDEFL flow list includes only land use exchanges. This shortcoming was brought up in review but the original authors' response is:

The critical review by Edelen et. al (2018) revealed two main types of ‘Land’ flowables, land occupation and land transformation. Current usage of land transformation flows provides incomplete information as it describes either the land before transformation or the land after transformation, but never both. For example, ‘transformation to cropland’, only describes the product of the transformation, but not the original land. It is the perspective of the authors that land transformation is not a flow, but rather an activity and land flowables should describe the land cover.

Since this theoretical justification causes a practical data loss in regards to existing databases and methods, and a shortcoming to the usage of those, Earthster has added explicit transformation flows:

  • Land transformation (before, from)

  • Land transformation (after, to)

To model the permanent occupation of land for hazardous and radioactive waste, we added the following exchanges:

  • Volume occupied, final repository for radioactive waste resource/ground`

  • Volume occupied, final repository for low-active radioactive waste resource/ground`

  • Volume occupied, underground deposit resource/ground`

For both land use and land transformation exchanges, the context in which they occur is crucial. For example, occupying land as a forest (Land use resource/ground/terrestrial/forest) is generally much more beneficial to the environment than occupying the same area for industrial purposes (Land use resource/ground/human-dominated/industrial/urban).

The FEDEFL resolution for land use categories is relatively coarse and does not capture the full diversity of land use types found in databases such as ecoinvent or ILCD. To improve compatibility, we extended FEDEFL by adding additional land type flows that fully cover the ecoinvent and ILCD categories.

The table below shows how FEDEFL land use contexts correspond to ecoinvent land use flows:

Table 3: Land use and land transformation contexts used in Earthster, whether they are native FEDEFL contexts and corresponding Ecoinvent land use.

Context

original FEDEFL context?

Ecoinvent flowable

resource/ground

yes

resource/ground/human-dominated

yes

unspecified

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural

yes

arable land, unspecified use

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/annual crop

no

annual crop

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/annual crop/flooded crop

no

annual crop, flooded crop

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/annual crop/greenhouse

no

annual crop, greenhouse

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/annual crop/irrigated

no

annual crop, irrigated

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/annual crop/irrigated/extensive

no

annual crop, irrigated, extensive

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/annual crop/irrigated/intensive

no

annual crop, irrigated, intensive

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/annual crop/non-irrigated

no

annual crop, non-irrigated

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/annual crop/non-irrigated/extensive

no

annual crop, non-irrigated, extensive

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/annual crop/non-irrigated/intensive

no

annual crop, non-irrigated, intensive

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/heterogeneous

no

heterogeneous, agricultural

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/pasture, man made

no

pasture, man made

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/pasture, man made/extensive

no

pasture, man made, extensive

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/pasture, man made/intensive

no

pasture, man made, intensive

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/permanent crop

no

permanent crop

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/permanent crop/irrigated

no

permanent crop, irrigated

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/permanent crop/irrigated/extensive

no

permanent crop, irrigated, extensive

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/permanent crop/irrigated/intensive

no

permanent crop, irrigated, intensive

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/permanent crop/non-irrigated

no

permanent crop, non-irrigated

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/permanent crop/non-irrigated/extensive

no

permanent crop, non-irrigated, extensive

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/permanent crop/non-irrigated/intensive

no

permanent crop, non-irrigated, intensive

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/rural

yes

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/urban

yes

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/cropland fallow (non-use)

no

cropland fallow (non-use)

resource/ground/human-dominated/agricultural/field margin or hedgerow

no

field margin/hedgerow

resource/ground/human-dominated/commercial

yes

resource/ground/human-dominated/commercial/rural

yes

resource/ground/human-dominated/commercial/urban

yes

resource/ground/human-dominated/construction site

no

construction site

resource/ground/human-dominated/dump site

no

dump site

resource/ground/human-dominated/dump site/inert material landfill

no

dump site, inert material landfill

resource/ground/human-dominated/dump site/residual material landfill

no

dump site, residual material landfill

resource/ground/human-dominated/dump site/sanitary landfill

no

dump site, sanitary landfill

resource/ground/human-dominated/dump site/slag compartment

no

dump site, slag compartment

resource/ground/human-dominated/industrial

yes

industrial area

resource/ground/human-dominated/industrial/rural

yes

resource/ground/human-dominated/industrial/urban

yes

resource/ground/human-dominated/mineral extraction site

no

mineral extraction site

resource/ground/human-dominated/residential

yes

resource/ground/human-dominated/residential/rural

yes

resource/ground/human-dominated/residential/urban

yes

resource/ground/human-dominated/rural

yes

resource/ground/human-dominated/traffic area

no

resource/ground/human-dominated/traffic area/rail network

no

traffic area, rail network

resource/ground/human-dominated/traffic area/rail or road embankment

no

traffic area, rail/road embankment

resource/ground/human-dominated/traffic area/road network

no

traffic area, road network

resource/ground/human-dominated/urban

yes

resource/ground/human-dominated/urban or industrial fallow (non-use)

no

urban/industrial fallow (non-use)

resource/ground/human-dominated/urban/continuously built

no

urban, continuously built

resource/ground/human-dominated/urban/discontinuously built

no

urban, discontinuously built

resource/ground/human-dominated/urban/green area

no

urban, green area

resource/ground/terrestrial

no

unspecified, natural (non-use)

resource/ground/terrestrial/barren land

yes

bare area (non-use)

resource/ground/terrestrial/forest

yes

forest, unspecified

resource/ground/terrestrial/forest/extensive

no

forest, extensive

resource/ground/terrestrial/forest/intensive

no

forest, intensive

resource/ground/terrestrial/forest/primary (non-use)

no

forest, primary (non-use)

resource/ground/terrestrial/forest/secondary (non-use)

no

forest, secondary (non-use)

resource/ground/terrestrial/grassland

yes

resource/ground/terrestrial/grassland/livestock grazing

no

grassland, natural, for livestock grazing

resource/ground/terrestrial/grassland/natural (non-use)

no

grassland, natural (non-use)

resource/ground/terrestrial/shrubland

yes

shrub land, sclerophyllous

resource/ground/terrestrial/snow and ice

yes

snow and ice (non-use)

resource/ground/terrestrial/wetland

yes

resource/ground/terrestrial/wetland/coastal (non-use)

no

wetland, coastal (non-use)

resource/ground/terrestrial/wetland/inland (non-use)

no

wetland, inland (non-use)

resource/water

yes

resource/water/brackish water body

yes

resource/water/brackish water body/lake

yes

resource/water/brackish water body/lake/rural

yes

resource/water/brackish water body/lake/urban

yes

resource/water/fresh water body

yes

inland waterbody, unspecified

resource/water/fresh water body/lake

yes

resource/water/fresh water body/lake/rural

yes

lake, natural (non-use)

resource/water/fresh water body/lake/urban

yes

lake, artificial

resource/water/fresh water body/river

yes

resource/water/fresh water body/river/rural

yes

river, natural (non-use)

resource/water/fresh water body/river/urban

yes

river, artificial

resource/water/saline water body

yes

resource/water/saline water body/ocean

yes

resource/water/saline water body/ocean/seabed

no

seabed, unspecified

resource/water/saline water body/ocean/seabed/drilling and mining

no

seabed, drilling and mining

resource/water/saline water body/ocean/seabed/infrastructure

no

seabed, infrastructure

resource/water/saline water body/ocean/seabed/natural (non-use)

no

seabed, natural (non-use)

Fossil, biogenic, and land-use carbon exchanges

Introduced 2023-10-04

When modeling greenhouse gas emissions, it is common to distinguish the origin of carbon — whether it comes from fossil sources, biogenic sources, or land-use changes. Even ISO 14067 requires this separation to ensure transparent accounting of carbon flows.

There is an ongoing discussion in FEDEFL in regards to how to account for such flows. Earthster introduced exchange names to track each one of those types of flows, for the main greenhouse gases. This was based on available data from databases and impact assessment methods.

The added exchange names are presented below:

Table 2: Biogenic and land use exchanges and their counterparts in Ecoinvent and ICLD

Exchange name in Earthster

Ecoinvent

ILCD

Carbon dioxide, biogenic

Carbon dioxide, non-fossil

Carbon dioxide (biogenic)

Carbon dioxide, land use

Carbon dioxide, from soil or biomass stock

Carbon dioxide (land use change)

Carbon monoxide, biogenic

Carbon monoxide, non-fossil

Carbon dioxide (biogenic)

Carbon monoxide, land use

Carbon monoxide, from soil or biomass stock

Carbon monoxide (land use change)

Methane, biogenic

Methane, non-fossil

Methane (biogenic)

Methane, land use

Methane, from soil or biomass stock

Methane (land use change)

Methane, fossil

Methane

Methane

Other flows

In addition to the above, the following exchange names were also added to Earthster as an extension to Earthster:

Table 5: Other exchange names added to Earthster, which do not yet exist in FEDEFL.

Exchange name

Class

Unit

Date added

1,3-Cyclohexanedione, 2-[2-chloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)benzoyl]-

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

3-Hexyne-2,5-diol, 2,5-dimethyl-

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Amine oxides

Group

kg

2025-11-09

Ammonium sulfate

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Butene

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Coal, anthracite

Geological

kg

2025-11-09

Coal, bituminous

Geological

kg

2025-11-09

Coal, lignite

Geological

kg

2025-11-09

Coal, sub-bituminous

Geological

kg

2025-11-09

Crude oil

Geological

kg

2025-11-09

Curium alpha

Chemicals

kBq

2025-11-09

Cypermethrin

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Dibutyltin

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Dimethyldichlorosilane

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Fluquinconazole

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Glufosinate

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Hydrocarbons, aliphatic, alkanes, cyclic

Group

kg

2025-11-09

Hydrocarbons, aliphatic, alkanes, unspecified

Group

kg

2025-11-09

Hydrocarbons, aliphatic, unsaturated

Group

kg

2025-11-09

Iron(III)

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Natural gas

Geological

m3

2025-11-09

Nitrogen, bound, organic

Group

kg

2025-11-09

Nitrogen, bound, unspecified

Group

kg

2025-11-09

Peat

Geological

kg

2025-11-09

Penflufen

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Phenyltin

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Phosphonic acid, monoethyl ester

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Phosphorus oxychloride

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Phosphorus pentachloride

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Phosphorus trichloride

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Plutonium alpha

Chemicals

kBq

2025-11-09

Pydiflumetofen

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Quizalofop-P

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Radioactive species, alpha emitters

Group

kBq

2025-11-09

Radioactive species, other beta emitters

Group

kBq

2025-11-09

Sodium methoxide

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Spiroxamine

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Tribenuron

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Triethylammonium

Chemicals

kg

2025-11-09

Uranium alpha

Chemicals

kBq

2025-11-09

Aluminium sulfate

Chemicals

kg

2024-12-04

Amisulbrom

Chemicals

kg

2024-12-04

Bixafen

Chemicals

kg

2024-12-04

Dichloroethylene

Chemicals

kg

2024-12-04

Disodium phosphate

Chemicals

kg

2024-12-04

Fenoxaprop-P

Chemicals

kg

2024-12-04

Fenpyrazamine

Chemicals

kg

2024-12-04

Flupyrsulfuron-methyl sodium

Chemicals

kg

2024-12-04

Haloxyfop-P

Chemicals

kg

2024-12-04

Iprovalicarb

Chemicals

kg

2024-12-04

Isophoronenitrile

Chemicals

kg

2024-12-04

Phenyl isocyanate

Chemicals

kg

2024-12-04

Proquinazid

Chemicals

kg

2024-12-04

Sodium dihydrogen phosphate

Chemicals

kg

2024-12-04

Tritosulfuron

Chemicals

kg

2024-12-04

Fungicides

Group

kg

2024-11-28

Insecticides

Group

kg

2024-11-28

Non-methane volatile organic compounds

Group

kg

2024-11-28

Oils, unspecified

Group

kg

2024-11-28

Paraffins

Groups

kg

2024-11-28

Uranium-238

Chemicals

kBq

2024-11-28

Change log and justifications of state

Until 2025-11-09

Up until this point we followed FEDEFL methodology strictly in regards to long-term flows. FEDEFL applies a conservative approach by treating long-term emissions as normal emissions. As a result, Earthster reported order-of-magnitude higher impacts than references (ecoinvent) for the EF inorganic toxicity categories, and on average about a 5% higher impact for EF Particulate matter.

Due to the absence of an exchange to track non-renewable flows of biomass (such as wood harvested from tropical forests), these were converted to normal biomass in Earthster. This affected the CED Non-renewable, biomass category in Earthster. FEDEFL accepted our suggestion for a new exchange for tracking non-renewable biomass, so it was added retroactively to older databases.

Other small extensions to the flow list (in process of committing them back to FEDEFL).

Until 2025-06-10

Volume occupied exchanges were added, to create a comprehensive view of land-related changes.

Until 2024-12-04

Small extensions of exchanges were added to align with ecoinvent 3.11

Until 2024-11-28

Land transformation flows were added. Small extensions of exchanges were added like Fungicides, Insecticides

Until 2023-10-04

Biogenic and land use carbon exchanges were added.

Did this answer your question?